CRS Bibliography

A collection of references to publications relevant to classroom response systems
Contact(s): 
Beatty, Ian D.

Educause Learning Initiative (2005). 7 things you should know about clickers. Resource Center Abstract ELI7002.

Abrahamson, L. A. (2006). A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications. In Banks, D. A., editor, Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA.

Asirvatham, M. R. (2005). IR clickers and ConcepTests: Engaging students in the classroom. Published online for the Winter 2005 CONFCHEM: Trends and New Ideas in Chemical Education.

Banks, D. A., editor (2006). Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA.

Bao, L., Reay, N. W., Baugh, G., and Warnakulasooriya, R. (2003). The use of voting machines in classroom instruction. AAPT Announcer, 33(2):147.

Beatty, I. D. (2000). Assessing-to-Learn project website, http://A2L.physics.umass.edu.

Beatty, I. D. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Research Bulletin ERB0403, Educause Center for Applied Research.

Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., and Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1):31-39.

Beatty, I. D., Leonard, W. J., Feldman, A. P., and Gerace, W. J. (2006). Illuminating teacher learning of technology-enhanced formative assessment. Contributed talk at the Summer Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Syracuse, NY. In AAPT Announcer, 36:133.

Beatty, I. D., Leonard, W. J., Feldman, A. P., and Gerace, W. J. (2006). Teacher learning of Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment. Contributed poster EJ07-4 at the Summer Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Syracuse, NY.

Beatty, I. D., Leonard, W. J., and Gerace, W. J. (2005). Assessing-to-Learn in the Classroom. Thomson Learning. {An annotated collection of CRS questions for teaching college physics, provided with several introductory physics texs by Serway.}

Beatty, I. D., Leonard, W. J., Gerace, W. J., and Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Question driven instruction: Teaching science (well) with an audience response system. In Banks, D. A., editor, Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA.

Beuckman, J., Rebello, N. S., and Zollman, D. (2006). Impact of a classroom interaction system on student learning. In Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Syracuse, NY.

Burnstein, R. A. and Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, 39:8-11.

Burnstein, R. A. and Lederman, L. M. (2003). Comparison of different commercial wireless keypad systems. The Physics Teacher, 41:272-275.

Chambers, J. (2007). Teaching by the polls. InterActions across Physics and Education, 37(1):20-21.

Crouch, C. and Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69:970.

Draper, J. and Brown, I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20:81.

Dubson, M. (2003). "Clickers": Electronic audience feedback in the classroom. http://www.colorado.edu/physics/EducationIssues/HITT/HITTDescription.html.

Dufresne, R. J. and Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing-to-learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42(6):109-116.

Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., and Beatty, I. D. (2002). Assessing-to-Learn (A2L): Reflective formative assessment using a classroom communication system. In Pathways to Change: An International Conference on Transforming Math and Science Education in the K16 Curriculum, Crystal City, Arlington, VA.

Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., and Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7:3-47.

Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Mestre, J. P., and Leonard, W. J. (2000). ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing student knowledge with instructional technology. Technical Report Dufrense-2000ia, UMass Scientific Reasoning Research Institute.

Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the classroom: How to enhance science teaching using classroom response systems. Addison-Wesley, New York.

Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers: A new teaching aid with exceptional promise. Astronomy Education Review, 5(1).

Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 20:206-209.

Feldman, A. and Capobianco, B. (2003). Real-time formative assessment: A study of teachers' use of an electronic response system to facilitate serious discussion about physics concepts. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Feldman, A. P. and Capobianco, B. M. (in press as of Jan 2008). Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology.

Fies, C. and Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1):101-109.

Graetz, K. A. (2006). The psychology of learning environments. Educause Review, 41(6):60- 74.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66:64-74.

Herreid, C. F. (2006). "Clicker" cases: Introducing case study teaching into large classrooms. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(2):43-47.

James, M. C. (2006). The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in peer instruction. American Journal of Physics, 74(8):689-691.

Johnson, D. and McLeod, S. (2004). Get answers: Using student response systems to see students' thinking. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(4):18-23.

Judson, E. and Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2):167.

Kaleta, R. and Joosten, T. (2007). Student response systems: A university of wisconsin system study of clickers. Research Bulletin ERB0710, Educause Center for Applied Research.

Lasry, N. (2007). Peer instruction: Comparing clickers to flashcards. Technical Report physics/0702186, Arxiv.org.

Li, P., Reay, N. W., and Bao, L. (2004). Effects of in-class polling on student performance in learning physics. Contributed poster CO26, 129th National Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Sacramento, CA.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Mestre, J. P., Gerace, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., and Leonard, W. J. (1997). Promoting active learning in large classes using a classroom communication system. In Redish, E. F. and Rigden, J. S., editors, The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, Volume 2, pp.1019-1036, Woodbury, NY. American Institute of Physics.

Ohio State University Physics Education Research Group (2007). In-class polling methodology for effective education: The voting machines. http://www.votingmachine.net/.

Penuel, W. R., Boscardin, C. K., Masyn, K., and Crawford, V. M. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55:315-346.

Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., Crawford, V., Schectman, N., and Abrahamson, L. A. (2004). CATAALYST workshop report: Advancing research on the transformative potential of interactive pedagogies and classroom networks. Workshop Report P14566, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.

Randolph, J. J. (in press?). A meta-analysis of the research on response cards: The effects of response cards on test achievement, quiz achievement, participation, and off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.

Reay, N. W., Bao, L., Baugh, G., and Warnakulasooriya, R. (2003). Business-style group work in a freshman engineering honors class. In Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference.

Reay, N. W., Bao, L., Warnakulasooriya, R., and Baugh, G. (2006). Toward the effective use of voting machines in physics lectures. American Journal of Physics, 73(6):554-558.

Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19:260-272.

Roschelle, J., Abrahamson, L. A., and Penuel, W. R. (2004). Integrating classroom network technology and learning theory to improve classroom science learning: A literature synthesis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Roschelle, J. and Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1:145-168.

Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., and Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5):50-54.

Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., and Abrahamson, L. A. (2004). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Wenk, L., Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., and Mestre, J. P. (1997). Technology-assisted active learning in large lectures. In McNeal, A. and D'Avanzo, C., editors, Student Active Science: Models of innovation in undergraduate science teaching, pp.431-451. Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, FL.

Wieman, C. and Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, 58(11):36-41.

Zollman, D. and Rebello, N. S. (2005). The evolving classroom response system at KSU: Classtalk, PRS, PDAs. Contributed talk EG08 at the 130th National Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Albuquerque, NM.