Scientific Reasoning Research Institute - whole class discussion http://www.srri.umass.edu/taxonomy/term/36/0 en stephens-2015ups http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/662 <div class="pub-title">Use of physics simulations in whole class and small group settings: Comparative case studies</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn <br />Clement, John J. </div> <div class="pub-year">(2015)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p><em>Computers &amp; Education, 86,</em> 137-156</p> </div> <div class="pub-abstract"> <p>This study investigates student interactions with simulations, and teacher support of those interactions, within naturalistic high school classroom settings. Two lesson sequences were conducted, one in 11 and one in 8 physics class sections, where roughly half the sections used the simulations in a small group format and matched sections used them in a whole class format. Unexpected pre/post results, previously reported, had raised questions about why whole class students, who had engaged in discussion about the simulations while observing them projected in front of the class, had performed just as well as small group students with hands-on keyboards. The present study addresses these earlier results with case studies (four matched sets of classes) of student and teacher activity during class discussions in one of the lesson sequences. Comparative analyses using classroom videotapes and student written work reveal little evidence for an advantage for the small group students for any of the conceptual and perceptual factors examined; in fact, if anything, there was a slight trend in favor of students in the whole class condition. We infer that the two formats have counter-balancing strengths and weaknesses. We recommend a mixture of the two and suggest several implications for design of instructional simulations.</p> </div> <div class="pub-doi"><span class="pub-field-label">DOI(s):</span> 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.014</div> <table id="attachments" class="sticky-enabled"> <thead><tr><th>Attachment</th><th>Size</th> </tr></thead> <tbody> <tr class="odd"><td><a href="http://www.srri.umass.edu/system/files/private/Stephens%20Clement%20whole%20class%20sm%20grp%20C%2526E%202015_0.pdf">Stephens Clement whole class sm grp C&amp;E 2015.pdf</a></td><td>2.26 MB</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/662#comments educational simulations mental modeling physics education science education research small group discussion videotape analysis whole class discussion Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:26:36 +0000 Jang Kreetong 662 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2012srv http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/660 <div class="pub-title">\Student recognition of visual affordances: Supporting use of physics simulations in whole class and small group settings. (Doctoral Dissertation)</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn</div> <div class="pub-year">(2012)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 424 pages. Open Access Dissertations. Paper 668.</p> </div> <div class="pub-abstract"> <p>The purpose of this study is to investigate student interactions with simulations, and teacher support of those interactions, within naturalistic high school physics classroom settings. This study focuses on data from two lesson sequences that were conducted in several physics classrooms. The lesson sequences were conducted in a whole class discussion format in approximately half of the class sections and in a hands-on-computer small group format in matched class sections. Analysis used a mixed methods approach where: (1) quantitative methods were used to evaluate pre-post data; (2) open coding and selective coding were used for transcript analysis; and (3) comparative case studies were used to consider the quantitative and qualitative data in light of each other and to suggested possible explanations. Although teachers expressed the expectation that the small group students would learn more, no evidence was found in pre-post analysis for an advantage for the small group sections. Instead, a slight trend was observed in favor of the whole class discussion sections, especially for students in the less advanced sections. In seeking to explain these results, qualitative analyses of transcript and videotape data were conducted, revealing that many more episodes of support for interpreting visual elements of the simulations occurred in the whole class setting than in the matched small group discussions; not only teachers, but, at times, students used more visual support moves in the whole class discussion setting. In addition, concepts that had been identified as key were discussed for longer periods of time in the whole class setting than in the matched small group discussions in six of nine matched sets. For one of the lesson sequences, analysis of student work on in-class activity sheets identified no evidence that any of the Honors or College Preparatory students in the small groups had made use in their thinking of the key features of the sophisticated and popular physics simulation they had used, while such evidence was identified in the work of many of the whole class students. Analysis of the whole class discussions revealed a number of creative teaching strategies in use by the teachers that may have helped offset the advantage of hands-on experience with the simulations and animations enjoyed by the small group students. These results suggest that there may exist whole class teaching strategies for promoting at least some of the active thinking and exploration that has been considered to be the strength of small group work, and appear to offer encouragement to teachers who do not have the resources to allow their classes to engage regularly in small group work at the computer. Furthermore, these examples suggest the somewhat surprising possibility that there may be certain instructional situations where there is an advantage to spending at least part of the time with a simulation or animation in a whole class discussion mode.</p> </div> <div class="pub-permalink"><span class="pub-field-label">Permalink(s):</span> <a href="http://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/668">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/668</a></div> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/660#comments educational simulations mental modeling physics education science education research small group discussion videotape analysis whole class discussion Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:06:08 +0000 Jang Kreetong 660 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2011hos http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/502 <div class="pub-title">Hands on small-group vs. whole-class use of animations and simulations: Comparative case studies in projectile motion</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn</div> <div class="pub-year">(2011)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Orlando, FL</p> </div> <div class="pub-abstract"> <p>Years one and two of a three-year study revealed that, contrary to their teachers' expectations, students working hands on with computer animations and simulations in small groups with a teacher circulating among the groups performed no better, as measured by pre-post gains, than students engaging in teacher-moderated whole class discussions while observing the animations and simulations projected onto a screen before the class. Similar results have been obtained in year three. Initial case study analyses suggested there might exist teaching strategies for promoting at least some of the active thinking and exploration that has been considered to be the strength of small group work. The present study analyzes transcripts from a Projectile Motion lesson sequence taught during years two and three. Pre-post results are presented. Comparative case study analyses of matched sets of classes look closely at features of whole class and small group discussions that accompanied use of Quicktime animations, coding for presence of several factors that appeared to be associated with active reasoning in the initial case studies. One finding was the presence in whole class discussion of many more episodes of support for interpreting the meaning of visual elements in the animations than was present in the small groups. The Whole Class case studies examined here suggest the possibility that there may be certain instructional situations where there is an advantage to spending at least part of the time with the simulation or animation in a whole class discussion mode.</p> </div> <table id="attachments" class="sticky-enabled"> <thead><tr><th>Attachment</th><th>Size</th> </tr></thead> <tbody> <tr class="odd"><td><a href="http://www.srri.umass.edu/sites/srri/files/Stephens_2011NARST_final.pdf">Stephens_2011NARST_final.pdf</a></td><td>805.71 KB</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/502#comments comparative case study computer simulations high school physics small group discussion whole class discussion Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:21:31 +0000 lstephens 502 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2006cte http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/479 <div class="pub-title">Running effective classroom thought experiments: What expert protocols and imagery indicators can tell us</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn <br />Clement, John, J.</div> <div class="pub-year">(2006)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>Conference paper accompanying a poster presentation at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA.</p> </div> <div class="pub-abstract"> <p>The purpose of this study is to explore reasoning processes that students use when running thought experiments (TEs) in science classrooms. We also focus on the use of depictive hand motions, which we regard as providing some evidence for the involvement of mental imagery in these episodes of student reasoning. We discuss our analysis of several of the episodes in terms of four forms of expert reasoning that have been associated with expert use of TEs (Clement, in preparation). We coded independently for these processes and for the occurrence of depictive hand motions. This allows us a window onto the roles imagery (and TEs) appear to be playing in student thinking during these large class discussions, where students were being asked to generate and evaluate explanatory models of phenomena.</p> </div> <table id="attachments" class="sticky-enabled"> <thead><tr><th>Attachment</th><th>Size</th> </tr></thead> <tbody> <tr class="odd"><td><a href="http://www.srri.umass.edu/sites/srri/files/AERA06StepClemExpReas.pdf">Complete conference paper (PDF)</a></td><td>1.09 MB</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/479#comments expert-novice gesture high school imagery physics thought experiments videotape analysis whole class discussion Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:23:07 +0000 lstephens 479 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2006dim http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/478 <div class="pub-title">Evidence for dynamic imagery during model construction in classroom discussions</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn <br />Clement, John J.</div> <div class="pub-year">(2006)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>Poster presentation at American Association of Physics Teachers 2006 Summer Meeting (AAPT), Syracuse, NY.</p> </div> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/478#comments dynamic imagery gesture high school imagery physics videotape analysis whole class discussion Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:17:51 +0000 lstephens 478 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2009spt http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/475 <div class="pub-title">Spontaneous and planned thought experiments during whole class discussions: Use of teacher- and student-generated TEs in high school science</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn</div> <div class="pub-year">(2009)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>Presentation at the International History and Philosophy of Science Teaching Group Tenth International Conference (IHPST), Notre Dame, South Bend, IN.</p> </div> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/475#comments high school physics thought experiments videotape analysis whole class discussion Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:02:37 +0000 lstephens 475 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2010sgw http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/472 <div class="pub-title">Small group vs. whole class use of interactive computer simulations: Comparative case studies of matched high school physics classes</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn <br />Vasu, Ileana <br />Clement, John, J.</div> <div class="pub-year">(2010)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, PA.</p> </div> <div class="pub-abstract"> <p>Although it is generally felt that online simulations are better used in small groups working hands-on at computers, many teachers do not have ready access to the number of computer stations required. We ask whether teachers can engage students in effective, active learning when the students are not able to explore a simulation/animation on their own. Several teachers taught a number of high school physics topics in their classes using simulations in either of two conditions: a) small groups working hands-on at computers, and b) whole classes observing simulations projected from a single computer onto a screen before the class. We examine sets of matched classes to compare pre-post gains and teaching strategies used. The three teachers of the classes analyzed here anticipated that the small class format would work better, and students did appear at first glance to be more engaged in small groups. However, results showed that the whole class format produced similar—and in one comparison, significantly stronger—gains, as measured by pre-post tests. We use the pre-post results and videotape evidence to look at issues that may have affected student learning in the two kinds of situations.</p> </div> <table id="attachments" class="sticky-enabled"> <thead><tr><th>Attachment</th><th>Size</th> </tr></thead> <tbody> <tr class="odd"><td><a href="http://www.srri.umass.edu/sites/srri/files/Stephens Vasu NARST 2010final.pdf">Complete conference paper (PDF)</a></td><td>1.33 MB</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/472#comments comparative case study computer simulations high school physics small group discussion whole class discussion Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:31:00 +0000 lstephens 472 at http://www.srri.umass.edu stephens-2012rte http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/471 <div class="pub-title">The role of thought experiments in science and science learning</div> <div class="pub-authors">Stephens, A. Lynn <br />Clement, John, J.</div> <div class="pub-year">(2012)</div> <div class="pub-citation"><p>In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, &amp; C. McRobbie (Eds.), <em>Second International Handbook of Science Education: Springer International Handbooks of Education, Vol 24, Part 2</em> (pp. 157-175). Dordrecht: Springer.</p> </div> <div class="pub-abstract"> <p>This chapter will (1) briefly review selected studies examining the nature of thought experiments in science; (2) review previous studies on the role that thought experiments can play in science instruction; (3) give case study examples of thought experiments (TEs) proposed by both teachers and students and the en-suing classroom discussions. We discuss several definitions for the term thought experiment and examine methods that have the potential to illuminate issues such as the following: students can generate their own TEs as well as discuss ones pro-posed by the teacher; students give evidence of using imagery during TEs as indi-cated by certain imagery indicators; one can track how a TE spreads “conta-giously” between students in a discussion and how it is modified and improved in the process. We will conclude that student TEs can be similar to expert TEs in many ways and raise possible factors that make teacher generated TEs foster stu-dent discussion and sense making.</p> </div> <div class="pub-permalink"><span class="pub-field-label">Permalink(s):</span> Original publication available at <a href="http://www.springerlink.com" title="www.springerlink.com">www.springerlink.com</a></div> <div class="pub-doi"><span class="pub-field-label">DOI(s):</span> 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_13</div> <table id="attachments" class="sticky-enabled"> <thead><tr><th>Attachment</th><th>Size</th> </tr></thead> <tbody> <tr class="odd"><td><a href="http://www.srri.umass.edu/sites/srri/files/StephensClementTE.pdf">StephensClementTE.pdf</a></td><td>1.31 MB</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> http://www.srri.umass.edu/node/471#comments gesture high school imagery physics thought experiments videotape analysis whole class discussion Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:24:33 +0000 lstephens 471 at http://www.srri.umass.edu